Michel Maisonneuve: Canada doesn't matter to the rest of
the world — and it's our own fault
Trudeau's neglect for the military has atrophied our diplomatic muscle to a
point of international embarrassment
Michel Maisonneuve, Special to National Post
Published Jan 06, 2024
The relative peace we have enjoyed since the end of the Cold War has never been
as challenged as it is today, and Canada, once a reasonably formidable player on
the international stage, has no role in shaping the world’s uncertain future.
Our military and diplomatic capabilities have been permitted to diminish, and
major voices in both defence and business have taken to warning the rest of us
of the consequences.
Perrin Beatty, former minister of national defence and current CEO of the
Canadian Chamber of Commerce, decried the woeful state of Canada’s presence on
the world stage last weekend in an open letter addressed to Prime Minister
Justin Trudeau. This was not Beatty’s first public plea to end the government’s
complacency and take defence seriously. In 1987, as minister of defence, he
tabled a white paper proposing to rearm the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF),
increase funding and add nuclear submarines to the fleet. His idea was good then
and it is good now.
In November, Vice-Admiral Angus Topshee, commander of the Royal Canadian Navy,
published a video explaining the dire state of the force. Among other problems,
Topshee reported that only one of the navy’s new offshore patrol vessels can
only be deployed at a single time due to personnel shortages. The navy’s old
Halifax-class frigates, he added, will remain Canada’s “only surface combatants”
for at least 15 years despite being at the end of their design life.
I am sure the Privy Council Office was unhappy to see Topshee’s video, but the
navy’s sailors must have been relieved to see their commander telling it like it
is.
More recently, Vice-Admiral Bob Auchterlonie, commander of the Canadian Joint
Operations Command (CJOC), was quoted Dec. 31, telling the blunt truth that
Canadians are “overly comfortable” in spite of the deteriorating international
situation. The CJOC commands and coordinates all military operations in Canada
and abroad, so Auchterlonie is uniquely aware of all the hotspots in the world
and the potential for regional conflicts to escalate into broader war.
Auchterlonie spoke to the current situation as he knows it, and I am glad he
did. Canadian Armed Forces personnel are doing an amazing job with very little
funding, equipment and government support. They are the best, but they are
tired. It is difficult to imagine them being stretched further and perhaps being
placed in harm’s way, but the current global situation may produce just that
scenario.
These issues feed into bigger issues concerning international diplomacy.
Auchterlonie correctly points out that we are too complacent, enjoying the
cocoon of comfort provided by three oceans and a big brother to the south.
Beatty notes that Canada is increasingly irrelevant on the global stage, and
that our diplomatic muscle has atrophied.
At Global Affairs Canada, our diplomats must be feeling as downtrodden as the
military, fraught with Chinese interference in elections and in the day-to-day
lives of Chinese Canadians, allegations of an assassination on Canadian soil by
India that remain unproven and managing flip-flopping positions on the Hamas
terrorist attack of October. Abandoning Israel, our friend and staunch ally, by
voting in December for a United Nations motion denying the country its right to
self-defence, Canada has now been publicly thanked by Hamas leader Ghazi Hamad.
Meanwhile, aid promised by Canada to Ukraine in the form of a $400 million air
defence system, which provided the Prime Minister’s Office with photo-ops, has
yet to arrive a year later. Germany’s Chancellor Olaf Scholz was turned away
from Canada in 2022, Trudeau’s explanation being that there “has never been a
strong business case” to export natural gas.
Now, Canada is being excluded from alliances and treaties like the Indo-Pacific
Economic Framework for Prosperity (IPEF), as well as AUKUS, a security
partnership between Australia, the United Kingdom and the United States.
The point that seems to elude our government and many Canadians is that our
weight in international diplomacy is a function of our military capability; we
must be able to fly the flag on international missions and participate with our
allies in exercises to be taken seriously. Right now, our ability is severely
restricted. While the U.S., France and U.K. have all shot down Houthi missiles
in the Red Sea, Canada has contributed only three staff officers to Operation
Prosperity Guardian.
Beatty supported the government’s Indo-Pacific Strategy in his letter, and so do
I. But a strategy requires the means to accomplish it, and the chief of the
defence staff only has a finite number of ships. We had three ships in the
Pacific over the last few months, but they have now returned home. What will
Canada do now? When will we send more? There are not enough crews to outfit the
few ships we have left, and many of them need to be refit.
In his video, Topshee warned that Canada’s new surface combatants won’t be ready
for many years. What are the diplomats in Asia going to do without that support?
No Canadian presence, no port visits. Sorry, Japan, no one from Canada will be
around for a few years. Sorry, Australia, we wish we could exercise with you as
part of AUKUS, but we do not belong. Sorry, U.S., although we have a senior
officer and some staff at Indo-Pacific Command headquarters, this will not
translate into a greater Canadian presence in the area.
Canada’s armed forces have been neglected for many years, and no one in cabinet
— especially the prime minister — cares. Our minister of national defence, Bill
Blair, is new to the portfolio and has probably seen the real status of the
forces; will he have the guts to demand the prime minister pay more attention to
the military? Blair’s predecessor, Anita Anand, probably did, and she was
removed. So who will do it? I am glad military leaders are speaking out. More
Canadians need to tell our political leaders we support our CAF and the
difficult situation they are in.
So thank you, Perrin Beatty, for your letter to the prime minister, and for
pointing out that neglect for the CAF has repercussions that go far beyond the
military. A capable CAF would improve our reputation abroad and show Canadians
that their country is a nation that matters — as it has been in the world wars
and operations since.
National Post
Lt.-Gen. (retd.) Michel Maisonneuve spent 35 years in the CAF and 10 more as
Academic Director of RMC Saint-Jean. He served as the last Chief of Staff of
NATO’s Supreme Allied Command Atlantic and the first Chief of Staff of NATO’s
Supreme Allied Command Transformation in Norfolk, Va. He was named the 30th
annual laureate of the Vimy Award in 2020.